THE HUMAN COST OF COMMUTING
Kay Hall, SVP Global Advisory Services EMEA • July 31, 2019
Whether your employer initiated the commuting arrangement or whether you chose to avoid relocating your family, this arrangement is hard. Putting compliance issues aside, the toll on our physical and mental health is higher than we often realize. For this reason, many best practice organisations are starting to monitor this population more closely, and global mobility commuter policies generally cap long distance commuter arrangements to 6 months. According to Airinc’s 2019 Mobility Outlook Survey, commuter policies are the number one global mobility policy that companies want to develop right now. Why is there so much commuting, and why is it so problematic?
Why Commute At All?
Sometimes long-distance commuting makes sense. It’s possible that an employer wants to avoid the expense of an international relocation, but often it’s at the request of the employee for practical reasons, most often to avoid disruption to the family, such as the spouse’s career or the children’s education. This is ironic as in my view (and experience of both), commuting is the most disruptive to a family in the long run. Whereas a traditional international relocation is initially very stressful and a major upheaval for the entire family, once the dust settles, most assignees enjoy this unique life experience, which broadens our horizons and leaves lasting memories. Commuters on the other hand, are faced with minimal stress to begin with, but the stress gradually increases over time as all the travel and family separation takes its toll. The suitcase remains a permanent fixture in your home décor and worse of all, there is often no end in sight.
Effects on the Family Unity
So, what happens? When commuting extends too long, the traveling employee is often physically and mentally exhausted from time zone changes, long workdays and inadequate sleep. Through no-one’s fault, the daily chores are left to the at-home partner who must absorb the full load on top of a job and often parenting. This leaves both partners physically exhausted such that the little time they do spend together is difficult to enjoy.
Resentment can build up with one partner envying the commuter’s jet-setting lifestyle and abundance of alone time. The commuting parent, on the other hand, will miss seeing their children and playing an active role in their daily lives, feeling more and more like a visitor in their own home. The ‘at-home' lifestyle is viewed by the other as easy; after all, that parent doesn’t have to travel each week and live out of a suitcase. Communication inevitably suffers and two parallel lives start to emerge. There are few companies supporting their commuters with these personal challenges, but that could be hugely beneficial to employee wellbeing.
Socially, extended commuting arrangements also leave their mark. When free family time is so precious, there’s a tendency to protect it to the exclusion of friends and neighbors. During the working week, both partners are faced with a more subtle change of status, neither fitting in the couples nor the singles scene. Isolation can creep up on you and now you are well and truly on the slippery slope.
Looking to the Future
Thankfully many companies are aware of the human challenges of commuting and that lifestyle support from the employer benefits all parties; whereas until now compliance has been the main driver of commuter policies. Strategic Global mobility departments will often push back and advise the business when an assignment type is unsuitable. Our general awareness of the importance of mental health has helped pave the way. With the changing nature of the workforce, the growth of the gig economy and contractors, this will become ever more challenging for companies.
“While we have always supported short-term commuting arrangements as a necessary tool in facilitating international moves during term-time, for example, our experience shows that long-term commuting arrangements can place unacceptably high pressures on both the expat and their family.” -- Gill Gordon, HR director Schlumberger UK & chairman of Permits Foundation
What is your organization doing to minimize the emotional, physical and social toll of commuting?
Does your policy extend to contractors?
Share your stories below, your ideas and experiences are great to hear!
Share this post
Duty of care has long been central to global mobility—but its scope is widening. As organizations face new workforce expectations, diverse family profiles, and increasingly global teams, the question becomes: What does meaningful care look like today?
In a recent conversation with NetExpat, Mark Vaughan, Head of Global Mobility Policy at Maersk, offered a candid look at what it takes to modernize mobility policies in a way that is practical, inclusive, and aligned with today’s workforce realities.
Sam combines a bilingual, multicultural upbringing with deep global mobility experience. Born in Belgium to a British father and Belgian mother, she began her career in education—later moving into consultancy and, in 2003, into international mobility. At NetExpat since 2009, Sam blends operational excellence with advisory insight, working directly with clients and assignees to design people‑centered solutions. She thrives on building trusted relationships across cultures and supporting family wellbeing, partner careers, and sustainable assignments. Her practical, empathetic approach turns complex mobility challenges into positive outcomes for organizations and the people they move.
Insights from Adeline Ong on how KPMG prioritizes repatriation.
For nearly a decade, the Relocating Family Support Survey —developed in partnership between NetExpat and EY—has served as the industry’s most comprehensive benchmark on the experience of relocating partners and families. Since its launch in 2018, the survey has captured insights from more than 4,400 participants worldwide, helping organizations understand the realities facing globally mobile families and the policies that most effectively support them. The 2026 edition builds on this foundation with input from over 340 respondents across 50 countries, offering a timely view into how mobility expectations, workforce demographics, and business priorities continue to evolve.
International relocations are a big adjustment for employees, but they can be an even bigger adjustment for their accompanying spouses or partners. This is especially true if they were a part of a dual income household in their country of origin. While organizations often focus on logistical support for the employee, the success of an international assignment hinges equally on the well-being of the entire family. If a relocating partner struggles to integrate, it can have negative impacts on the partner’s state of mind, the couple’s relationship, the employee’s ability to focus on their new role, and both assignment and organizational objectives.
Anu brings over seven years of experience in Learning & Development and Human Resources, shaping her career around helping people grow, adapt, and thrive. Her early passion for psychometrics, talent management, and capability‑building led her into the HR solutions space, where she deepened her expertise in behavioral insights and learning strategy before stepping into her role as Senior Manager, Advisory Services – India at NetExpat. Today, she supports Indian talent navigating global mobility and intercultural transitions, energized by daily conversations with individuals from around the world and inspired by the continuous learning that comes from working with a truly global team.
When it comes to global talent mobility, agility is crucial to an organization’s long-term strategy and competitiveness. With mounting pressure to deliver seamless employee experiences—while managing cost, compliance, and cultural complexity—the question isn’t just what to outsource, but also what to own and automate to stay relevant and scalable over time. This post explores how companies can align operational choices with their internal capacity, cultural context, and long-term goals. The right balance is unique to each organization’s talent and operational needs.
Des brings over 25 years of global mobility expertise, beginning with guiding people through the life-changing decision of buying and selling homes before moving into relocation in 1990. His passion lies in building impactful, human-centered mobility solutions, shaped by personal relocation experiences and lessons in cultural awareness. At NetExpat, he thrives on the intrapreneurial energy of a global team that feels like a “27-year-old start-up,” inspired daily by colleagues’ talent and dedication. Motivated by the chance to create sustainable solutions that truly make a difference for individuals, families, and organizations, Des envisions mobility evolving into a strategic, end-to-end resource that elevates the human experience.
When organizations support mobile employees during an intercultural assignment, they benefit long after those same individuals repatriate. The trouble is, too many businesses don’t see repatriation as a component of the assignment, which can have negative outcomes for both them and the employees they’ve invested in: Without repatriation support, employees face a myriad of challenges, from reverse culture shock and career uncertainty to feeling diminished. Businesses end up paying the price, from employees being disengaged to losing talent altogether. Both have negative impacts on a company’s ROI.
