THE HUMAN COST OF COMMUTING
Kay Hall, SVP Global Advisory Services EMEA • July 31, 2019
Whether your employer initiated the commuting arrangement or whether you chose to avoid relocating your family, this arrangement is hard. Putting compliance issues aside, the toll on our physical and mental health is higher than we often realize. For this reason, many best practice organisations are starting to monitor this population more closely, and global mobility commuter policies generally cap long distance commuter arrangements to 6 months. According to Airinc’s 2019 Mobility Outlook Survey, commuter policies are the number one global mobility policy that companies want to develop right now. Why is there so much commuting, and why is it so problematic?
Why Commute At All?
Sometimes long-distance commuting makes sense. It’s possible that an employer wants to avoid the expense of an international relocation, but often it’s at the request of the employee for practical reasons, most often to avoid disruption to the family, such as the spouse’s career or the children’s education. This is ironic as in my view (and experience of both), commuting is the most disruptive to a family in the long run. Whereas a traditional international relocation is initially very stressful and a major upheaval for the entire family, once the dust settles, most assignees enjoy this unique life experience, which broadens our horizons and leaves lasting memories. Commuters on the other hand, are faced with minimal stress to begin with, but the stress gradually increases over time as all the travel and family separation takes its toll. The suitcase remains a permanent fixture in your home décor and worse of all, there is often no end in sight.
Effects on the Family Unity
So, what happens? When commuting extends too long, the traveling employee is often physically and mentally exhausted from time zone changes, long workdays and inadequate sleep. Through no-one’s fault, the daily chores are left to the at-home partner who must absorb the full load on top of a job and often parenting. This leaves both partners physically exhausted such that the little time they do spend together is difficult to enjoy.
Resentment can build up with one partner envying the commuter’s jet-setting lifestyle and abundance of alone time. The commuting parent, on the other hand, will miss seeing their children and playing an active role in their daily lives, feeling more and more like a visitor in their own home. The ‘at-home' lifestyle is viewed by the other as easy; after all, that parent doesn’t have to travel each week and live out of a suitcase. Communication inevitably suffers and two parallel lives start to emerge. There are few companies supporting their commuters with these personal challenges, but that could be hugely beneficial to employee wellbeing.
Socially, extended commuting arrangements also leave their mark. When free family time is so precious, there’s a tendency to protect it to the exclusion of friends and neighbors. During the working week, both partners are faced with a more subtle change of status, neither fitting in the couples nor the singles scene. Isolation can creep up on you and now you are well and truly on the slippery slope.
Looking to the Future
Thankfully many companies are aware of the human challenges of commuting and that lifestyle support from the employer benefits all parties; whereas until now compliance has been the main driver of commuter policies. Strategic Global mobility departments will often push back and advise the business when an assignment type is unsuitable. Our general awareness of the importance of mental health has helped pave the way. With the changing nature of the workforce, the growth of the gig economy and contractors, this will become ever more challenging for companies.
“While we have always supported short-term commuting arrangements as a necessary tool in facilitating international moves during term-time, for example, our experience shows that long-term commuting arrangements can place unacceptably high pressures on both the expat and their family.” -- Gill Gordon, HR director Schlumberger UK & chairman of Permits Foundation
What is your organization doing to minimize the emotional, physical and social toll of commuting?
Does your policy extend to contractors?
Share your stories below, your ideas and experiences are great to hear!
Share this post
Learn how businesses can build workforce agility through flexible talent strategies, empowering employees and driving long-term organizational success.
Patricia Biffi brings a rich blend of business acumen and global perspective to her role at NetExpat, shaped by her journey from Brazil’s dynamic fashion retail industry to building a new chapter in the United States. With nearly two decades of experience spanning commercial and marketing leadership, she developed a strong foundation in driving growth, building high-performing teams, and keeping people at the center of every decision. Having personally navigated the challenges of relocation and career reinvention, Patricia combines resilience, adaptability, and a people-first mindset with a deep appreciation for cross-cultural experiences and the evolving landscape of global mobility.
The pharmaceutical industry is operating under extraordinary and accelerating pressure. Patent cliffs heightened regulatory scrutiny, geopolitical instability, pricing constraints, and an increasingly complex global R&D and manufacturing footprint are pushing organizations to do more—faster, with fewer resources, and under intense public and stakeholder scrutiny. At the same time, demand for specialized talent has never been higher. Unlike extractive or capital‑intensive industries such as oil and gas, pharma cannot rely on large financial incentives to drive international mobility. Scientific, regulatory, medical affairs, and quality expertise are scarce globally—yet many of the very professionals pharma needs most are reluctant to relocate. Dual‑career households, two‑income families, caregiving responsibilities, and reduced appetite for long assignments mean traditional mobility levers are no longer sufficient. In this context, Global Mobility (GM) is no longer just an enabler of relocation—it must become a strategic talent catalyst.
Whether driven by mergers, digital transformation, geopolitical shifts, or evolving market demands, change affects every corner of a global organization. And without the right support, teams can suffer, along with morale and alignment. Profit losses, decreased productivity, attrition and reputational damage are very real risks, and often signs that an organization’s change strategy failed to account for cultural context—both the organization’s internal culture and the cultural identities of its employees. Change is universal, but how we deal with it is deeply cultural. Even the most well-designed initiative can falter if it overlooks one critical factor: how people experience change. In global teams, that experience isn’t just shaped by roles, responsibilities, and team dynamics. It’s also shaped by the cultural norms, values, and perspectives each person brings to the workplace. And when leaders assume their teams will respond to change the same way they do, communications and processes can quietly unravel—sometimes under the radar and long before the negative impacts are fully recognized. To lead and address change effectively, business leaders need to understand the cultural lenses that shape how change is perceived, processed, and embraced (or rejected).
This blog post offers a glimpse into the exclusive content available to members of the NetExpat Community —designed specifically for the partners and spouses of transferees. From curated resources to peer-driven insights, this sample reflects the kind of meaningful support that helps partners/spouses feel seen, connected, and empowered.
Meet Pawl Mika, a globally minded leader at NetExpat whose international career and personal relocation experience shape his people-first approach to global mobility, client success, and team collaboration.
Navigating ambiguity in the automotive industry requires more than technical expertise. Discover how intercultural capability helps global teams improve communication, align priorities, and stay competitive under pressure.
Gabi brings a thoughtful, human‑centered approach to her work at NetExpat, shaped by a background in intercultural communication and international collaboration. With a strong belief that cultural competence is built through awareness, adaptability, and reflection, she designs practical, evidence‑based learning experiences that help people navigate complexity with confidence. Passionate about how adults learn and change, Gabi is motivated by creating solutions that make a real difference in how individuals and organisations work, connect, and thrive across cultures.
Duty of care has long been central to global mobility—but its scope is widening. As organizations face new workforce expectations, diverse family profiles, and increasingly global teams, the question becomes: What does meaningful care look like today?
In a recent conversation with NetExpat, Mark Vaughan, Head of Global Mobility Policy at Maersk, offered a candid look at what it takes to modernize mobility policies in a way that is practical, inclusive, and aligned with today’s workforce realities.
