ARE COST SAVINGS GETTING IN THE WAY OF YOUR DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION AGENDA?
Cecilia Franchi • July 18, 2019

A series of alternative approaches to International Mobility have emerged over the last few years. We have seen an increase in commuters, extended business travelers, and short-term assignments. Frequently, these “split family assignments” try to contribute to the deployment of talent around the globe while saving costs. We all agree that gender diversity is a must within organizations, with international assignments being an essential path to upper management positions. But are these cost saving initiatives helping or preventing gender diversity within our organizations? A series of studies support what our experience on the ground is telling us: female talent is more sensitive and reluctant than their male counterparts to accept split family assignments. Leaving their partner/spouse and children behind for a few months of commuting is not working well for female talent, whatever the age group. So, if your cost cutting initiatives are indirectly affecting your diversity and inclusion agenda, what does it mean for you as an international employer? Unaccompanied assignments for families have been on the rise for several years, either driven by the employee for practical reasons, or to cut costs for employers. Consequently, when cost-cutting is the main objective and these assignments progress long-term, it often becomes unsustainable for the family and may negatively impact employee retention
AIRINC’S 2019 Mobility Outlook Survey* reports that cost savings are now a permanent priority for most GM departments, whereas until now cost considerations have been somewhat cyclical or sector specific. This has led to the creation of many types of ‘light’ packages, with stripped down perks. On a global perspective, the partner of a female expat is more likely to prioritize their career than the partner of a male expat. This is in no way prejudiced but simply based on statistics, namely the number of non-working women which still outweighs men. With respect to traditional accompanied long term assignments, you could therefore deduce that female expats are more likely to expect or need spousal career assistance and other family-related assignment services whilst on assignment. In this sense, today’s lower cost packages, with trimmed down benefits, may be more discouraging to female talent than their male counterparts and this is working against the diversity goals of most organizations.
Jonathan Dunlea, Partner at PwC and Abbie Cooke, Global Mobility Consulting Senior Manager at PwC add: “With cost pressures persuading even more employers to look at different ways to approach mobility, many of these new approaches to mobility (extended business travel, commuter assignments, short term assignments etc.) can place additional pressure on the family unit, and disrupt “traditional” gender role expectations. It is important for employers to understand the ‘mobile readiness’ of their female employees, and that this changes over time due to stage of career, family and other personal commitments. Through alignment between talent management and global mobility, the right international opportunities can be identified at the right time for more female employees. Costs can still be managed in any scenario through building flexibility and choice into the mobility framework and policy options, therefore the resulting support and benefits package is more tailored to the individual’s needs and circumstances, without creating exceptions and additional entitlements. We believe that employers who are willing to take a flexible approach to their mobility policies and benefit entitlements will have a competitive advantage through mobilizing more of their female talent. Where employees are able to select assignment benefits which are most relevant to them (perhaps additional childcare support, or additional home leave flights, specific spousal support) and trade down benefits which might be less relevant, it will hand some degree of control back to the female expatriate, and maximize the chances of them taking the opportunity offered.”
Share this post

Patricia Biffi brings a rich blend of business acumen and global perspective to her role at NetExpat, shaped by her journey from Brazil’s dynamic fashion retail industry to building a new chapter in the United States. With nearly two decades of experience spanning commercial and marketing leadership, she developed a strong foundation in driving growth, building high-performing teams, and keeping people at the center of every decision. Having personally navigated the challenges of relocation and career reinvention, Patricia combines resilience, adaptability, and a people-first mindset with a deep appreciation for cross-cultural experiences and the evolving landscape of global mobility.

The pharmaceutical industry is operating under extraordinary and accelerating pressure. Patent cliffs heightened regulatory scrutiny, geopolitical instability, pricing constraints, and an increasingly complex global R&D and manufacturing footprint are pushing organizations to do more—faster, with fewer resources, and under intense public and stakeholder scrutiny. At the same time, demand for specialized talent has never been higher. Unlike extractive or capital‑intensive industries such as oil and gas, pharma cannot rely on large financial incentives to drive international mobility. Scientific, regulatory, medical affairs, and quality expertise are scarce globally—yet many of the very professionals pharma needs most are reluctant to relocate. Dual‑career households, two‑income families, caregiving responsibilities, and reduced appetite for long assignments mean traditional mobility levers are no longer sufficient. In this context, Global Mobility (GM) is no longer just an enabler of relocation—it must become a strategic talent catalyst.

Whether driven by mergers, digital transformation, geopolitical shifts, or evolving market demands, change affects every corner of a global organization. And without the right support, teams can suffer, along with morale and alignment. Profit losses, decreased productivity, attrition and reputational damage are very real risks, and often signs that an organization’s change strategy failed to account for cultural context—both the organization’s internal culture and the cultural identities of its employees. Change is universal, but how we deal with it is deeply cultural. Even the most well-designed initiative can falter if it overlooks one critical factor: how people experience change. In global teams, that experience isn’t just shaped by roles, responsibilities, and team dynamics. It’s also shaped by the cultural norms, values, and perspectives each person brings to the workplace. And when leaders assume their teams will respond to change the same way they do, communications and processes can quietly unravel—sometimes under the radar and long before the negative impacts are fully recognized. To lead and address change effectively, business leaders need to understand the cultural lenses that shape how change is perceived, processed, and embraced (or rejected).

This blog post offers a glimpse into the exclusive content available to members of the NetExpat Community —designed specifically for the partners and spouses of transferees. From curated resources to peer-driven insights, this sample reflects the kind of meaningful support that helps partners/spouses feel seen, connected, and empowered.

Gabi brings a thoughtful, human‑centered approach to her work at NetExpat, shaped by a background in intercultural communication and international collaboration. With a strong belief that cultural competence is built through awareness, adaptability, and reflection, she designs practical, evidence‑based learning experiences that help people navigate complexity with confidence. Passionate about how adults learn and change, Gabi is motivated by creating solutions that make a real difference in how individuals and organisations work, connect, and thrive across cultures.








