UNDERSTANDING THE CULTURAL COMPLEXITIES OF OUR WORLD
NetExpat Team • July 11, 2019
Prof. Geert Hofstede is interviewed by Alain Verstandig, President, NetExpat Group
Alain Verstandig: Professor Hofstede, about 30 years ago, you dedicated yourself, as no one else had, to understanding the cultural complexities of our world. If you had to conduct the same extensive study today, what would your dimensions and scores be?
Prof. Geert Hofstede:
Our world and its population has indeed changed since the late 80’s. My Dutch colleague, Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, compared data from the World Values Survey related to the six dimensions in our 2010 book, across two generations, 30 years apart, and his findings are very interesting. Take the dimension “Power Distance”, which measures how societies handle inequalities among people: people in societies scoring high in “Power Distance” accept a hierarchical order in which everyone has a place. In societies with low “Power Distance” scores, people constantly challenge inequalities of power. When you compare scores across 30 years, all cultures have gone down: our whole world is less hierarchical and requests more justification when facing inequalities. But the difference between countries has remained the same. All of the data I collected 30 years ago is still relevant and highlights relative positions of one country to the other, which has not changed much. What we have found is that all countries have evolved together.
The same applies to “Individualism”: all cultures today have become more individualist compared to 30 years ago. People from all cultures are expected to take care of themselves and their immediate families. Today, people’s self-image is more defined in terms of “I” than “we”. But here as well, differences between countries have remained the same.
The third dimension for which this is the case is our latest addition “indulgence versus restraint”: a measure of subjective feelings of happiness. “Indulgence” stands for a relatively free gratification of basic and human desires related to enjoying life and having fun. Its opposite, “restraint”, stands for a conviction that such gratification needs to be curbed and regulated by strict social norms. The younger generation in all countries has moved to the “indulgence” pole, while the ranking of countries was not affected. The remaining three dimensions did not systematically move, and the rankings of countries, on which our scores are based, showed to be rather stable.
So, all my scores have been proven to be quite stable over time. The forces that cause cultures to shift tend to be global or continent wide. This means that they affect many countries at the same time, so if their cultures shift, they shift together, and their relative positions remain the same.
AV: The word “culture” is often used to represent completely different concepts: what differences do you see between national cultures and corporate cultures?
GH: My research, along with the research of others, shows that national cultures tend to be acquired during the first 10 years of our lives. National cultures are built on fundamental values: what we perceive as right and wrong. They are not in our mind, they’re in our guts.
On the other hand, corporate cultures or job cultures are acquired much later in our working environment: they are more a set of practices and are meant for everyone in an organization to work harmoniously and efficiently together.
Even if the same word “culture” is used in these two concepts, our core “national values” are of a completely different nature than “corporate cultures”. You find far less conflict between organization and national cultures than among different national cultures.
AV:
How critical are intercultural competencies in our modern world?
GH:
Well Alain, it is encouraging to see that a growing majority of young graduates are exposed, through their studies, to cultural differences. Programs like Erasmus and all the study abroad initiatives push our future workforce to discover what a worldwide citizenship could mean.
But there is a difference between being a global student and becoming an active global employee. I see an unfortunate tendency for adults who
are successful in their specialized career to think that they are superior and do not need any cultural sensitivities. But to be a true world citizen, one of the most important things is that you are genuinely interested in other people. Our world is indeed more global, but the recipe for success in any international endeavor is still the same: if you are only interested in yourself, if you just listen to yourself, if you have no time
to listen and discover others, then 30 years ago you would have failed, and you will fail today. Humility is still central to the notion of being a world citizen.
Share this post
When organizations outsource business functions to another country—whether it’s accounting, customer service, or tech support—they’re often hoping for a streamlined, cost-effective solution. But when intercultural differences aren’t factored into the strategy, the shift often results in the exact opposite: misaligned expectations, breakdowns in communication, and friction across internal teams. Time is lost, along with trust, satisfaction ratings, and even clients. Too often, stakeholders don’t even know why. When internal teams find themselves working across cultures, misunderstandings are common. The definition of “good service” in one country may feel intrusive or inadequate in another. Perceptions of hierarchy and respect vary widely, leading to unintentional offenses. And communication styles are so nuanced that even simple messages can be misread—causing delays, confusion, and strained relationships. Internally, employee engagement and productivity suffer. Clients may notice the shift too—especially in customer-facing functions. Intercultural agility is the solution.
Leadership wants metrics, but they also need clarity. When you see a business need or opportunity, building the right business case with data is the way to give that to them. It’s also the best way for you to get buy-in. This blog post will discuss how to use data to strengthen business cases and the role of business storytelling in securing buy-in.
International relocations are a big adjustment for employees, but they can be an even bigger adjustment for their accompanying spouses or partners. This is especially true if they were a part of a dual income household in their country of origin. While organizations often focus on logistical support for the employee, the success of an international assignment hinges equally on the well-being of the entire family. If a relocating partner struggles to integrate, it can have negative impacts on the partner’s state of mind, the couple’s relationship, the employee’s ability to focus on their new role, and both assignment and organizational objectives.
Editorial from NetExpat Perspectives Newsletter Q3 2025
In a recent interview, Isabela Sena, Director of Global Mobility at Stellantis, shared her thoughts on talent mobility’s future. Read on to discover her views, and why people will stay central and elevated by AI.
This blog post offers a glimpse into the exclusive content available to members of the NetExpat Community —designed specifically for the partners and spouses of transferees. From curated resources to peer-driven insights, this sample reflects the kind of meaningful support that helps partners/spouses feel seen, connected, and empowered.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing talent management and mobility, making some administrative processes faster and more efficient. As businesses look to AI-driven tools to streamline everything from visa applications to predictive mobility analytics—they hope to control costs and ease the burden on internal talent mobility teams and mobile employees alike. But can technology alone accomplish all of that? While AI excels at automation and generating data-driven insights, the human touch is still essential for fostering positive experiences among employees and the businesses that employ them. Personalized coaching, relationship-building, and cultural adaptation are all areas where human empathy, intuition and expertise far surpass automated systems. As organizations embrace AI to optimize talent management and global mobility, finding the right balance between technology and human connection will be key to their success.
Discover the costs of ignoring cultural differences and strategies to ensure compliance for thriving international business operations.
Multinational companies face a significant challenge when working across cultures: how to strike a balance between being compliant and honoring cultural gift-giving norms in professional settings. Why is it such a challenge? What may be expected as a gesture of respect and goodwill in one culture could be considered bribery in another. Missteps can ultimately lead to a damaged company reputation, lost business opportunities, or even legal repercussions. Finding a balance between cultural expectations and compliance is a strategic imperative, but potential conflicts can feel completely overwhelming. With training and preparation, however, workforces can learn to navigate these scenarios with skill. Cultural Gift-Giving Differences in Professional Settings Gift giving has always been used in professional settings to show respect, build rapport, and lay the groundwork for meaningful business relationships around the world. Under the right circumstances, a carefully chosen gift can symbolize trust and partnership, opening the door to successful collaboration. Failure to understand cultural norms and expectations can result in costly mistakes. Below, we provide a few examples of varying gift-giving norms to illustrate the importance of cultural agility when doing business across cultures.
As Director of Global Client Services at NetExpat, Maru Machado brings a dynamic blend of operational expertise and global perspective to her role. With a rich background in international event production, clinical travel management, and client services, Maru brings a global mindset to everything she does. Her multicultural experience—both professional and personal as a former expat—deeply informs her approach to leadership and client support. Now leading a diverse team across the U.S., Maru thrives on connecting with people around the world, improving service delivery, and creating meaningful impact for globally mobile professionals and their families.
