UNDERSTANDING THE CULTURAL COMPLEXITIES OF OUR WORLD
NetExpat Team • July 11, 2019
Prof. Geert Hofstede is interviewed by Alain Verstandig, President, NetExpat Group
Alain Verstandig: Professor Hofstede, about 30 years ago, you dedicated yourself, as no one else had, to understanding the cultural complexities of our world. If you had to conduct the same extensive study today, what would your dimensions and scores be?
Prof. Geert Hofstede:
Our world and its population has indeed changed since the late 80’s. My Dutch colleague, Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, compared data from the World Values Survey related to the six dimensions in our 2010 book, across two generations, 30 years apart, and his findings are very interesting. Take the dimension “Power Distance”, which measures how societies handle inequalities among people: people in societies scoring high in “Power Distance” accept a hierarchical order in which everyone has a place. In societies with low “Power Distance” scores, people constantly challenge inequalities of power. When you compare scores across 30 years, all cultures have gone down: our whole world is less hierarchical and requests more justification when facing inequalities. But the difference between countries has remained the same. All of the data I collected 30 years ago is still relevant and highlights relative positions of one country to the other, which has not changed much. What we have found is that all countries have evolved together.
The same applies to “Individualism”: all cultures today have become more individualist compared to 30 years ago. People from all cultures are expected to take care of themselves and their immediate families. Today, people’s self-image is more defined in terms of “I” than “we”. But here as well, differences between countries have remained the same.
The third dimension for which this is the case is our latest addition “indulgence versus restraint”: a measure of subjective feelings of happiness. “Indulgence” stands for a relatively free gratification of basic and human desires related to enjoying life and having fun. Its opposite, “restraint”, stands for a conviction that such gratification needs to be curbed and regulated by strict social norms. The younger generation in all countries has moved to the “indulgence” pole, while the ranking of countries was not affected. The remaining three dimensions did not systematically move, and the rankings of countries, on which our scores are based, showed to be rather stable.
So, all my scores have been proven to be quite stable over time. The forces that cause cultures to shift tend to be global or continent wide. This means that they affect many countries at the same time, so if their cultures shift, they shift together, and their relative positions remain the same.
AV: The word “culture” is often used to represent completely different concepts: what differences do you see between national cultures and corporate cultures?
GH: My research, along with the research of others, shows that national cultures tend to be acquired during the first 10 years of our lives. National cultures are built on fundamental values: what we perceive as right and wrong. They are not in our mind, they’re in our guts.
On the other hand, corporate cultures or job cultures are acquired much later in our working environment: they are more a set of practices and are meant for everyone in an organization to work harmoniously and efficiently together.
Even if the same word “culture” is used in these two concepts, our core “national values” are of a completely different nature than “corporate cultures”. You find far less conflict between organization and national cultures than among different national cultures.
AV:
How critical are intercultural competencies in our modern world?
GH:
Well Alain, it is encouraging to see that a growing majority of young graduates are exposed, through their studies, to cultural differences. Programs like Erasmus and all the study abroad initiatives push our future workforce to discover what a worldwide citizenship could mean.
But there is a difference between being a global student and becoming an active global employee. I see an unfortunate tendency for adults who
are successful in their specialized career to think that they are superior and do not need any cultural sensitivities. But to be a true world citizen, one of the most important things is that you are genuinely interested in other people. Our world is indeed more global, but the recipe for success in any international endeavor is still the same: if you are only interested in yourself, if you just listen to yourself, if you have no time
to listen and discover others, then 30 years ago you would have failed, and you will fail today. Humility is still central to the notion of being a world citizen.
Share this post
This blog post offers a glimpse into the exclusive content available to members of the NetExpat Community —designed specifically for the partners and spouses of transferees. From curated resources to peer-driven insights, this sample reflects the kind of meaningful support that helps partners/spouses feel seen, connected, and empowered.
Meet Pawl Mika, a globally minded leader at NetExpat whose international career and personal relocation experience shape his people-first approach to global mobility, client success, and team collaboration.
Navigating ambiguity in the automotive industry requires more than technical expertise. Discover how intercultural capability helps global teams improve communication, align priorities, and stay competitive under pressure.
Gabi brings a thoughtful, human‑centered approach to her work at NetExpat, shaped by a background in intercultural communication and international collaboration. With a strong belief that cultural competence is built through awareness, adaptability, and reflection, she designs practical, evidence‑based learning experiences that help people navigate complexity with confidence. Passionate about how adults learn and change, Gabi is motivated by creating solutions that make a real difference in how individuals and organisations work, connect, and thrive across cultures.
Duty of care has long been central to global mobility—but its scope is widening. As organizations face new workforce expectations, diverse family profiles, and increasingly global teams, the question becomes: What does meaningful care look like today?
In a recent conversation with NetExpat, Mark Vaughan, Head of Global Mobility Policy at Maersk, offered a candid look at what it takes to modernize mobility policies in a way that is practical, inclusive, and aligned with today’s workforce realities.
Sam combines a bilingual, multicultural upbringing with deep global mobility experience. Born in Belgium to a British father and Belgian mother, she began her career in education—later moving into consultancy and, in 2003, into international mobility. At NetExpat since 2009, Sam blends operational excellence with advisory insight, working directly with clients and assignees to design people‑centered solutions. She thrives on building trusted relationships across cultures and supporting family wellbeing, partner careers, and sustainable assignments. Her practical, empathetic approach turns complex mobility challenges into positive outcomes for organizations and the people they move.
Insights from Adeline Ong on how KPMG prioritizes repatriation.
For nearly a decade, the Relocating Family Support Survey —developed in partnership between NetExpat and EY—has served as the industry’s most comprehensive benchmark on the experience of relocating partners and families. Since its launch in 2018, the survey has captured insights from more than 4,400 participants worldwide, helping organizations understand the realities facing globally mobile families and the policies that most effectively support them. The 2026 edition builds on this foundation with input from over 340 respondents across 50 countries, offering a timely view into how mobility expectations, workforce demographics, and business priorities continue to evolve.
International relocations are a big adjustment for employees, but they can be an even bigger adjustment for their accompanying spouses or partners. This is especially true if they were a part of a dual income household in their country of origin. While organizations often focus on logistical support for the employee, the success of an international assignment hinges equally on the well-being of the entire family. If a relocating partner struggles to integrate, it can have negative impacts on the partner’s state of mind, the couple’s relationship, the employee’s ability to focus on their new role, and both assignment and organizational objectives.
